The suit lodged by Plaintiff Jesse Dominguez claimed that the background investigation form in Stone's employment application improperly combined a background investigation disclosure and authorization into one document and failed to include required disclosures. Plaintiff brought class claims under the Fair Credit Reporting Act (FCRA) and analogous California consumer protection laws.

The employment application Plaintiff submitted to Stone contained an arbitration agreement that was ultimately deemed valid and binding by the judge. According to the judge, by initialing this paragraph, Plaintiff had signified that he had read and agreed to those terms.

Plaintiff argued to the contrary, stating that the agreement was invalid because his employment application was superseded by an offer letter that contained no arbitration requirement. The judge disagreed, contending that the offer letter was silent regarding arbitration and didn't override the arbitration language in the employment application. The judge also ruled that Plaintiff must arbitrate his claims on an individual basis, rather than as a class representative.

The case is Dominguez v. Stone Brewing Co., 2020 BL 248429 (S.D. Cal., No. 3:20-cv-00251).

Posted: July 16, 2020

All Rights Reserved © 2020 Truescreen, Inc.
This document and/or presentation is provided as a service to our customers. Its contents are designed solely for informational purposes, and should not be inferred or understood as legal advice or binding case law, nor shared with any third parties. Persons in need of legal assistance should seek the advice of competent legal counsel. Although care has been taken in preparation of these materials, we cannot guarantee the accuracy, currency or completeness of the information contained within it. Anyone using this information does so at his or her own risk.